Oppositespeak


A handy guide to help you understand your cosmo-liberal interlocutor - in case you thought words were what they used to be...

Liberal = belonging to an ideology intolerant of incorrect speech

Tolerant = refusing to tolerate incorrect opinions; also: having the correct opinion, often referring in particular to automatically loving anything foreign

Inclusive = refusing to include people with incorrect opinions

Open-minded = refusing to consider incorrect opinions; also: having the correct opinion, often referring in particular to loving anything foreign

Narrow-minded = conversely: willing to consider all opinions; also: having come to an incorrect opinion

Extreme =  having come to the incorrect opinion, e.g. opposed to extreme immigration
[Note also "extremist" = a case needing to be conceptually separated from the group in order to uphold the concept of identicality of groups, e.g. "Islamic extremist" = not to be counted as a "real" Muslim]

Society = people in the same place, having ideally little or nothing (except geography) in common and no sense of a common identity separating them from the rest of the world, especially not in terms of heritage, ethnicity, or belonging

Nation = group of people affiliated to the same state, ideally having little or nothing (except geography) in common and no sense of a common identity separating them from the rest of the world, especially not in terms of heritage, ethnicity, or belonging

Internationalist = in favour of the populations of all places and states having little or nothing in common and no sense of a common identity separating them from the rest of the world, especially not in terms of heritage, ethnicity, or belonging; otherwise stated: opposed to all nations (in the oldspeak sense of the word 'nation')

Democracy = a system where people vote in order to decide how the country will be run; unless they vote incorrectly, in which case they can be asked again, or the seniormost judges can just make shit up

Ignorant = too well informed to consider all cultures, ethnicities and religions to be identical

"Not racist" = demanding special treatment for people whose race is not white; also: opposed to the composition of and group/organisation/population composed of white people; also: anti-white [e.g. anti-racist "I'd oppress white people" Zamzam Ibrahim]

Debate = a dialogue between a correct person and an incorrect person, where the latter is not permitted to say anything the correct person might not be willing to hear

Fascist Usage varies very widely, now generally indicates:  a supporter of liberal democracy with incorrect opinions


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Dramatis personae, The State Counsellor, by Boris Akunin

A list of the characters I compiled for myself, because I was getting confused. The State Counsellor DRAMATIS PERSONAE State Counsellor Erast Petrovich FANDORIN - Deputy for Special Assignments to His Excellency the Governor-General of Moscow Prince Vladimir Andreevich DOLGORUKOI - long-standing Governor-General of Moscow Frol Grigorievich VEDISHCHEV - the influential old personal servant of Prince Dolgorukoi Adjutant General Ivan Fyodorovich KHRAPOV - a senior government official, travelling at the beginning of the story to his new appointment as governor-general of Siberia. Staff Captain SEIDLITZ - an officer on the staff of Khrapov Colonel  Stanislav  Filippovich SVERCHIN SKY - acting commander of the Gendarmerie in Moscow Lieutenant Colonel Pyotr Ivanovich BURLYAEV  - the head of Moscow's Department for Public Security Titular Counsellor S ergei  Vitalievich ZUBTSOV -  the young senior operations officer for Burlyaev,...
Read more

The fallacy of non-identical outcomes

The fallacy of (non-)identical outcomes Any two non-identical groups of human beings will, by virtue of the very fact that they are identifiably non-identical groups, have non-identical characteristics, and will therefore be reasonably expected to experience non-identical outcomes. Relevant characteristics to any given outcome can be incorporated into two categories, one covering all relevant involuntary characteristics, the other covering all relevant voluntary characteristics. We might call these two categories  potentiality  and  choices . If two groups are identifiably non-identical, it is very likely that they will firstly, proceed with non-identical  potentiality , for example differing averaged-out innate abilities, or inheritance, and secondly make non-identical choices ,  on average,  on all sorts of levels . The end outcome (or actuality, if you like) cannot, therefore, be reasonably  expected  to be the identical.  The fal...
Read more

Relative poverty

A brief categorisation of relative poverty  This being in response to the ideas that there will always be poverty, in the sense that it is relative, and that in reality the relatively poor are not actually poor, objectively speaking. Relative poverty, in the ordinary sense, derived from differing incomes or costs - inevitable and in some sense desirable, in that it is the only alternative to total equality of outcome. (NB: Inheritance, being unearned, is not justified by this logic.) Competitive poverty - The difficulties created by experiencing "relative" poverty in an economy where others can dominate your life choices and possibilities by being richer. Accommodation and education are good examples of areas where this can occur. Transport is a partial example.In many countries, healthcare could be added as another example. Insertional poverty - It depends on your view of human nature I suppose, but I think it very reasonable to include social ins...
Read more