The fallacy of non-identical outcomes
The fallacy of (non-)identical outcomes Any two non-identical groups of human beings will, by virtue of the very fact that they are identifiably non-identical groups, have non-identical characteristics, and will therefore be reasonably expected to experience non-identical outcomes. Relevant characteristics to any given outcome can be incorporated into two categories, one covering all relevant involuntary characteristics, the other covering all relevant voluntary characteristics. We might call these two categories potentiality and choices . If two groups are identifiably non-identical, it is very likely that they will firstly, proceed with non-identical potentiality , for example differing averaged-out innate abilities, or inheritance, and secondly make non-identical choices , on average, on all sorts of levels . The end outcome (or actuality, if you like) cannot, therefore, be reasonably expected to be the identical. The fallacy of non-identical outcomes is the falla